Now

Now I’m just saying, and don’t leap all over me with vitriolic hostility or anything, I’m just saying that Canada produces between 1.4% and 1.5% of the world’s greenhouse gases. If we grow a few more trees we’ll be negligible yet we are the recipient of some of the most draconian measures here or yet to be in the world. It makes no sense. Logically does it? Or am I missing something? China produces 27 to 30%, United States 10 to 12% and India 6 to 8%. So with all our cars and gas and oil and industry and trucks as they are right now we can just stay just as we are and the world would be just fine. It makes no sense unless we are to become some kind of “feather in the cap” of the globalists—their shining environmental star. At such an expense. At such suffering of so many. Can anybody make rational sense of this? We are not all perfect. Would it not be better to put all this money and environmental demands and technology and restrictions on those countries first? We’d all help. Better put our money there then to freakin’ global wars. We could help them until they were within a small range of emissions and then we could look at what needs doing after that? I dunno. Some days I don’t understand. I might understand tomorrow but the suffering and destruction of the middle and lower classes to an ideology of environmentalism when we’re not the bad guys per se is outrageous. But then again, we’re the ones made dependant on China’s industry. That is true…. That’s the only way we can help. By not buying from countries with huge emissions. How likely is that? Ach… I dunno